S. Tuncer Et Al. , "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.," Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42, pp.253-263, 2017
Tuncer, S. Et Al. 2017. Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.. Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42 , 253-263.
Tuncer, S., Demirci, M., Öztaş, E., TEKÇE, N., & UYSAL, Ö., (2017). Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.. Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42, 253-263.
Tuncer, Safa Et Al. "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.," Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42, 253-263, 2017
Tuncer, Safa Et Al. "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.." Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42, pp.253-263, 2017
Tuncer, S. Et Al. (2017) . "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.." Restorative dentistry & endodontics , vol.42, pp.253-263.
@article{article, author={Safa TUNCER Et Al. }, title={Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results.}, journal={Restorative dentistry & endodontics}, year=2017, pages={253-263} }