İ. BAKIR Et Al. , "Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?," THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5, pp.304-309, 2007
BAKIR, İ. Et Al. 2007. Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5 , 304-309.
BAKIR, İ., Casselman, F. P., De Geest, R., Wellens, F., Degrieck, I., Van Praet, F., ... Vermeulen, Y.(2007). Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5, 304-309.
BAKIR, İhsan Et Al. "Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?," THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5, 304-309, 2007
BAKIR, İhsan Et Al. "Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?." THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5, pp.304-309, 2007
BAKIR, İ. Et Al. (2007) . "Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?." THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON , vol.55, no.5, pp.304-309.
@article{article, author={İhsan BAKIR Et Al. }, title={Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?}, journal={THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON}, year=2007, pages={304-309} }