M. Dincer Et Al. , "Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men," UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2, pp.215-221, 2017
Dincer, M. Et Al. 2017. Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2 , 215-221.
Dincer, M., Kucukdurmaz, F., Salabas, E., Ortac, M., Aktan, G., & Kadioglu, A., (2017). Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2, 215-221.
Dincer, Murat Et Al. "Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men," UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2, 215-221, 2017
Dincer, Murat Et Al. "Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men." UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2, pp.215-221, 2017
Dincer, M. Et Al. (2017) . "Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men." UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS , vol.98, no.2, pp.215-221.
@article{article, author={Murat Dincer Et Al. }, title={Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men}, journal={UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS}, year=2017, pages={215-221} }