Lower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controls

Creative Commons License

Togay B., Cikrikcili U., Bayraktaroglu Z., Uslu A., Noyan H., Ucok A.

EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2019 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası:
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/eip.12845
  • Dergi Adı: EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: clinical high risk for psychosis, cognition, familial risk for psychosis, prepulse inhibition, ULTRA-HIGH RISK, SCHIZOPHRENIA-PATIENTS, VULNERABILITY MARKER, STARTLE RESPONSE, GATING DEFICITS, HERITABILITY, INDIVIDUALS, SENSORIMOTOR, CONSORTIUM, GENETICS
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Aim Although the lower level of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is well known in schizophrenia, the onset of this difference is not clear. The aim of the present study was to compare PPI in individuals with clinical and familial high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls. Methods We studied PPI in individuals within three groups: ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR, n = 29), familial high risk for psychosis (FHR, n = 24) and healthy controls (HC, n = 28). The FHR group was chosen among siblings of patients with schizophrenia, whereas UHR was defined based on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). We collected clinical data using the BPRS-E, SANS and SAPS when individuals with UHR were antipsychotic-naive. A cognitive battery that assessed attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal learning and memory domains was applied to all participants. Results PPI was lower in the UHR group compared with both the FHR and HC groups. Those with a positive family history for schizophrenia had lower PPI than others in the UHR group. There was no difference in PPI between the FHR and HC groups. We found no relationship between PPI and cognitive performance in the three groups. Startle reactivity was not different among the three groups. Positive and negative symptoms were not related to PPI and startle reactivity in the UHR group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that clinical and familial high-risk groups for psychosis have different patterns of PPI.