Efficacy of two different materials in repair of urethandimethacrylate


Ateş G., ÇİLİNGİR A. A., BİLHAN H., SÜLÜN T., GEÇKİLİ O.

36 th Annual Congress EPA European Prosthodontic Association, Netherlands, pp.104, (Full Text)

  • Publication Type: Conference Paper / Full Text
  • Country: Netherlands
  • Page Numbers: pp.104
  • Istanbul University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the flexural properties of a recently
introduced urethane dimethacrylate denture base material (Eclipse) after being repaired with two
different materials.
Materials and Methods: Two repair groups and a control group were generated. The ES group was
repaired with auto-polymerizing polymer. The EE group was repaired with the Eclipse. The E group was
left intact as a control group. A 3-point bending test device which was set to travel at a crosshead speed
of 5 mm/min was used. Specimens were loaded until fracture occurred and the mean displacement,
maximum load, flexural modulus and flexural strength values and standard deviations were calculated
for each group.
Results: The mean “displacement”, “maximum load before fracture”, flexural strength” and “flexural
modulus” rates of the Group E were statistically significant higher than the Groups ES and EE (p<0.01),
but no significant difference (p>0.05) was found between the mean values of Group ES and EE. There
was a statistically significant positive relation (p<0.01) between the displacement and maximum load of
Group ES (99.5%), Group EE (94.3%) and Group E (84.4%).
Conclusion: The more economic and commonly used self curing acrylic resin can be recommended as
an alternative repair material for Eclipse denture bases.