A study on the effect of using magnetized water in dilution of the milt of Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax) on sperm motility

Ahmed M. H., Keskin İ., Özkorucuklu S., Ekici A.

Aquaculture Research, cilt.53, sa.17, ss.6324-6332, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 53 Sayı: 17
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/are.16104
  • Dergi Adı: Aquaculture Research
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), Artic & Antarctic Regions, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Environment Index, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Geobase, INSPEC, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.6324-6332
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: computer-assisted sperm analysis, magnetic, motility, Salmo trutta labrax, sperm
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Sperm motility is an important character for the assessment of milt quality and indicator to the expected rate of fertilization. Many factors can affect the sperm motility, including nature of water used as sperm activator medium after stripping the milt from the male fish. The aim of this study was to gain motility to spermatozoa and improve sperm kinematic parameters by applying a non-chemical method. The effects of magnetic field on samples of hatchery water exposed to magnetic field of 2.71, 4.51 and 8.11 mT for the duration of 12, 24 and 36 hours on Salmo trutta labrax sperm motility were investigated with computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system; 4.51 mT exposure for 36 hours (A2H3) was greater in motility kinematic parameters (p < 0.05) and progressive kinematic parameters (VAP, VSL and VCL) with values of (93.1244 ± 37.222, 88.6111 ± 36.137, 96.8378 ± 35.396 μm/s) and (102.9167 ± 32.546, 100.9767 ± 31.894, 105.8778 ± 30.401 μm/s) respectively. But there was no (p ≥ 0.05) in the slow phase just in the VCL parameter had (p ≤ 0.05) (35.8789 ± 39.127 μm/s) among other parameters. There was (p ≤ 0.05) in starting motility time until vibration point (s) for 4.51 mT in 12 hour (A2H1) (27.3333 ± 1.527 s), but total time of motility was greater for 4.51 mT in 36 hour (A2H3) with (p ≤ 0.05) (49.6667 ± 2.081 s) compared with other treatments.