Power crafting at work: A phenomenological study on individual differences


Berber A., ACAR A. G.

HUMAN RELATIONS, cilt.74, sa.11, ss.1889-1915, 2021 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 74 Sayı: 11
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/0018726720942828
  • Dergi Adı: HUMAN RELATIONS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, FRANCIS, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Periodicals Index Online, ABI/INFORM, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, CINAHL, Communication & Mass Media Index, EBSCO Education Source, Education Abstracts, Educational research abstracts (ERA), Gender Studies Database, Index Islamicus, Political Science Complete, Psycinfo, Public Affairs Index, Social services abstracts, Sociological abstracts, Violence & Abuse Abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, DIALNET
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1889-1915
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

What does having power mean, notfor, buttoan individual at work? In this article, we focus on the individual's concerns and experiences in the work setting and discuss how individuals conceptualise and construct their own power at work. This perspective is important due to its corresponding implications for how individuals choose their jobs, how they show proactive work behaviours and how they are engaged in power relations in organisations. In-depth interviews with 11 participants were subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis and key themes were identified to explain how these individuals cognitively, socially and operationally crafted their 'own' versions of power in their organisations. Despite the idiosyncratic similarity among the participants, our analysis revealed a clear divide: 'position-based power holders' and 'territory holders'. We first present our findings and results with interview excerpts and implications drawn from the emergent themes based on participant accounts. Next, we focus on two individual cases to explain how these individuals identified themselves as power holders within their own organisational contexts. Finally, we discuss our findings in association with other theoretical frameworks and concepts including the meaning of power, the organisational context and proactive work behaviours.