Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Quality and Quantity, 2025 (Scopus)
Multi-criteria decision-making is a crucial process in various fields, where decisions are made based on multiple, often conflicting criteria with group of decision makers. Traditional multi-criteria decision-making methods face challenges in handling uncertainty and vagueness inherent in real-world problems. To address these challenges, various adaptations have been emerged. In recent years, the studies on interval-valued neutrosophic sets demonstrates the promising and successful results of them as a robust tool. Interval-valued neutrosophic sets extend the concept of neutrosophic sets by incorporating interval values to better represent the degree of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity associated with each criterion. This enhanced representation allows for a more flexible and comprehensive analysis of complex decision-making scenarios including group decision making. In multi-criteria decision-making problems, the integration of interval-valued neutrosophic sets facilitates the modeling of uncertainty and imprecision, enabling decision-makers to evaluate alternatives more accurately. The interval-valued approach captures a broader range of possible values, reflecting the inherent uncertainty in the decision-making process. To this aim, an integrated interval-valued neutrosophic AHP-MOORA approach is proposed in this study. The proposed approach is applied to project manager selection to check the effectiveness and applicability of it.