Research Information System
in: GOSUDARSTVO BUDUŞÇEGO: AKTUAL'NYYE PROBLEMY SOTSİAL'NO-EKONOMİÇESKOGO İ POLİTİKO-PRAVOVOGO RAZVİTİYA Sbornik statey VII Mejdunarodnoy nauçno-praktiçeskoy konferentsii, E.S. Gareyev,L.M. Gaysina,A.V. Bondarenko,N.V. Grogulenko,L.O. İziliyayeva,P.A. Minakov,A.A. Bikmullina, Editor, İzdatel'stvo UGNTU, Ufa, pp.65-75, 2024
Firstly, we are going to discuss about the possible reasons of the generational
conflict in the first quarter of the 20th century and the reference of the phrase
«generational conflict» in the article. According to highly influential sociologist Bryan
Turner’s dictionary of sociology, the word generation is being defined at least five
different types:
- to indicate levels within an extended kinship structure;
- to indicate general stages or sections in the life course of a group;
- to refer to people who experienced a common historical period;
- denoting a subset of a historical generation with a common political or cultural
identity;
- to refer to a defined age group within the population.
According to Turner, as life expectancy increases significantly in advanced
industrial societies, it's more common for multiple generations to coexist within
families. This has prompted researchers in family studies to investigate how
intergenerational relationships impact family dynamics.
In the article, generation conflict will be examined through the definition of the
first (to indicate levels within an extended kinship structure) and the fourth type
(denoting a subset of a historical generation with a common political or cultural
identity) in Turner's list. Because, both works coincide with major change points in the
political and cultural identity of the society in which they were written, and this change
has made the distinction between generations connected by kinship increasingly clear
during the flow of the plot.