Impaired brachial endothelial function in patients with primary anti-phospholipid syndrome

MERCANOGLU F., ERDOGAN D., OFLAZ H., KUCUKKAYA R., SELCUKBIRICIK F., GUL A., ...Daha Fazla

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, cilt.58, sa.11, ss.1003-1007, 2004 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 58 Sayı: 11
  • Basım Tarihi: 2004
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00162.x
  • Dergi Adı: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1003-1007
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: primary anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, endothelial functions, vascular ultrasonography, MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, ANTIBODIES, ASSOCIATION, CELLS, CRITERIA, BINDING, YOUNG, RISK
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Although the precise pathophysiology of thrombosis is unknown in primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (PAPS), it is assumed that autoantibodies developed against endothelial cells and platelets might be one of the primary mechanisms. However, whether interaction between autoantibodies and endothelium leads to an impaired vasodilator response has not been investigated yet. In this study, we aimed to investigate the endothelial functions in patients with PAPS. Thirty-one patients with PAPS (22 female, nine male, mean age: 34.6 +/- 8.9 years) and 27 age- and sex-matched, healthy controls were included in the study. Brachial artery responses to reactive hyperaemia (endothelium-dependent dilatation) [EDD] and sublingual nitroglycerine (endothelium-independent dilatation) [EID] were measured by using high-resolution vascular ultrasound both in patients with PAPS and in the controls. The results were expressed as percentage of change in baseline values. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, there was no significant difference between the two groups. EDD in patients with PAPS was significantly lower than those of controls (6.9 +/- 4.9 vs. 14.8 +/- 4.1%; p<0.0001). EID measurements were not significantly different between the groups. In the PAPS group, EDD in patients with arterial involvement (17 patients) was significantly lower than those of patients with venous involvement (12 patients) (4.6 +/- 3.9 vs. 7.4 +/- 4.1%; p = 0.02).