<i>In vitro</i> assessment of the cytotoxic, genotoxic and oxidative stress effects of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 in human SH-SY5Y neuronal cells.

Sezer Y., Jannuzzi A. T., Huestis M. A., Alpertunga B.

Toxicology research, cilt.9, ss.734-740, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa078
  • Dergi Adı: Toxicology research
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Aqualine, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Pollution Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.734-740
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: JWH-018, synthetic cannabinoid, toxicity, in vitro, oxidative stress, SPICE, RECEPTOR, BLOOD, CB1, TOXICITY, METABOLITES, DAMAGE, IDENTIFICATION, INVOLVEMENT, CONSUMPTION
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: JWH-018 was the first synthetic cannabinoid introduced as a legal high and the first of the new generation of novel psychoactive substances that flooded worldwide drug markets. JWH-018 was marketed as "spice," "herbal incense," or "herbal blend," as a popular and legal (at the time) alternative to cannabis (marijuana). JWH-018 is a potent synthetic cannabinoid with considerable toxicity associated with its use. JWH-018 has qualitatively similar but quantitatively greater pharmacological effects than cannabis, leading to intoxications and even deaths. The mechanisms of action of the drug's toxicity require research, and thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the toxicological profile of JWH-018 in human SH-SY5Y neuronal cells. Methods: SH-SY5Y neuronal cells were exposed to increasing concentrations from 5 to 150 mu M JWH-018 over 24 h. Cytotoxicity, DNA damage, the apoptotic/necrotic rate, and oxidative stress were assessed following SH-SY5Y exposure. Results: JWH-018 did not produce a significant decrease in SH-SY5Y cell viability, did not alter apoptotic/necrotic rate, and did not cause genotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells with 24-h exposure. Glutathione reductase and catalase activities were significantly reduced; however, there was no significant change in glutathione peroxidase activity. Also, JWH-018 treatment significantly decreased glutathione concentrations, significantly increased protein carbonylation, and significantly increased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations. For significance, all P < 0.05. Discussion/Conclusion: JWH-018 produced oxidative stress in SH-SY5Y cells that could be an underlying mechanism of JWH-018 neurotoxicity. Additional in vivo animal and human-based studies are needed to confirm our findings.