Threshold optimization for lesion size in lutetium-177 single-photon emission computed tomography imaging: a phantom-based evaluation


Mutlu E., Şenişik A. M., Kovan B., Kuyumcu S., Demir B.

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, cilt.20, sa.NOVEMBER, ss.1079-1082, 2025 (Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 20 Sayı: NOVEMBER
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000002084
  • Dergi Adı: NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1079-1082
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background 

Accurate lesion volume estimation is essential for reliable voxel-based dosimetry in Lu-177 radionuclide therapy. Conventional fixed-threshold segmentation—particularly the commonly used 40% threshold—can markedly underestimate small lesions due to partial volume effects, leading to substantial errors in quantitative SPECT-based dosimetry.

Purpose 

This study systematically evaluated the relationship between lesion size and optimal threshold values in Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging, quantified deviations introduced by the fixed 40% threshold, and established size-specific adaptive thresholds to improve segmentation and activity recovery accuracy.

Methods 

A NEMA IEC body phantom with six spherical inserts (0.52–26.5 cm³) was filled with 20 mCi (740 MBq) Lu-177 at an 8 : 1 lesion-to-background ratio. SPECT/CT data were acquired using 60–90 projections with 10–20 s per frame. Images were reconstructed under 180 parameter combinations varying iterations, subsets, and filters. For each sphere, segmentation was performed using the fixed 40% threshold (40%ThS) and an adaptive, volume-matched threshold (AV%ThS) that reproduced the true physical volume.

Results 

Optimal thresholds showed a strong inverse correlation with lesion size, decreasing from ~83% (1.15 cm³) to ~42% (26.5 cm³). The fixed 40% threshold substantially underestimated volumes less than 25 cm³, with quantitative deviations reaching 45% compared to AV%ThS. Best quantitative recovery was achieved with 90 projections × 20 s and OSEM 10 × 10 iterations/subsets with Butterworth filtering (0.45 cycles/cm, order 10).

Conclusion 

A single fixed threshold is insufficient for accurate Lu-177 SPECT/CT dosimetry across diverse lesion sizes. Size-adaptive thresholding combined with optimized reconstruction parameters improves lesion delineation, enhances quantitative accuracy, and reduces dosimetric uncertainty in clinical practice.