Threshold optimization for lesion size in lutetium-177 single-photon emission computed tomography imaging: a phantom-based evaluation


Mutlu E., Şenişik A. M., Kovan B., Kuyumcu S., Demir B.

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, vol.47, no.2, pp.160-167, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 47 Issue: 2
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000002084
  • Journal Name: NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Page Numbers: pp.160-167
  • Istanbul University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Background Accurate lesion volume estimation is essential for reliable voxel-based dosimetry in Lu-177 radionuclide therapy. Conventional fixed-threshold segmentation-particularly the commonly used 40% threshold-can markedly underestimate small lesions due to partial volume effects, leading to substantial errors in quantitative SPECT-based dosimetry. Purpose This study systematically evaluated the relationship between lesion size and optimal threshold values in Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging, quantified deviations introduced by the fixed 40% threshold, and established size-specific adaptive thresholds to improve segmentation and activity recovery accuracy. Methods A NEMA IEC body phantom with six spherical inserts (0.52-26.5 cm(3)) was filled with 20 mCi (740 MBq) Lu-177 at an 8 : 1 lesion-to-background ratio. SPECT/CT data were acquired using 60-90 projections with 10-20 s per frame. Images were reconstructed under 180 parameter combinations varying iterations, subsets, and filters. For each sphere, segmentation was performed using the fixed 40% threshold (40%ThS) and an adaptive, volume-matched threshold (AV%ThS) that reproduced the true physical volume. Results Optimal thresholds showed a strong inverse correlation with lesion size, decreasing from similar to 83% (1.15 cm(3)) to similar to 42% (26.5 cm(3)). The fixed 40% threshold substantially underestimated volumes less than 25 cm(3), with quantitative deviations reaching 45% compared to AV%ThS. Best quantitative recovery was achieved with 90 projections x 20 s and OSEM 10 x 10 iterations/subsets with Butterworth filtering (0.45 cycles/cm, order 10). Conclusion A single fixed threshold is insufficient for accurate Lu-177 SPECT/CT dosimetry across diverse lesion sizes. Size-adaptive thresholding combined with optimized reconstruction parameters improves lesion delineation, enhances quantitative accuracy, and reduces dosimetric uncertainty in clinical practice.