Thermobarometry of Clinopyroxene, Amphibole and Biotite for the Oligo-Miocene Plutons (NW Turkiye): Comparison of Conventional and AI-Based Methods


Aysal N., ŞİŞMAN TÜKEL F.

JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, cilt.70, sa.4, ss.199-209, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 70 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3190/jgeosci.405
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Geobase
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.199-209
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

AI-based algorithms have increasingly found applications across various fields of geology, emerging as robust alternatives to conventional thermobarometric calibration strategies. In this study, the compatibility, distinctions, and reliability of these novel AI-driven approaches were assessed through a comparative analysis with conventional methods. Focusing on three representative case-study samples from the Oligo-Miocene plutons in northwestern Turkey, the pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions governing clinopyroxene, amphibole, and biotite crystallization were evaluated. The comparative analysis revealed significant methodological divergences. Conventional clinopyroxene barometers yielded widely scattered and often petrologically unrealistic pressure estimates (frequently > 10 kbar), whereas AI-based algorithms provided tightly clustered results consistent with shallow-to-mid crustal emplacement (2-4 kbar). For hydrous phases, while conventional methods indicated only shallow crystallization depths (< 2 kbar), AI-based models for amphibole and biotite consistently revealed deeper, mid-crustal crystallization conditions (similar to 5-6 kbar). These findings suggest that the studied plutons underwent polybaric crystallization, a history that is effectively captured by AI algorithms but partially obscured by conventional calibrations. Consequently, while AI-based approaches offer superior resolution for complex magmatic systems, the observed discrepancies highlight the necessity of integrating whole-rock geochemistry with mineral chemistry for robust geological interpretations.