Cultural adaptation and clinical validation of Rapid Cognitive Screening Test in Turkish


Erdogan T., Tufekcioglu Z., Sacar D. E., ÖREN ÇELİK M. M., BİLGİÇ B., KARAN M. A., ...Daha Fazla

PSYCHOGERIATRICS, cilt.24, sa.1, ss.87-93, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/psyg.13045
  • Dergi Adı: PSYCHOGERIATRICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Psycinfo
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.87-93
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: dementia, mild cognitive impairment, Rapid Cognitive Screen, screening
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BackgroundThe Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS) is a brief, easy to administer score screening tool for cognitive dysfunction which can be very useful for cognitive screening in busy clinical settings. We aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate RCS in Turkish.MethodsA total of 172 community-dwelling older participants from geriatric and neurology clinics, aged 60 and older were included. The translation and cultural adaptation process was carried out in five stages: (i) two initial translations from English to Turkish; (ii) combination of these two translations; (iii) backward translations; (iv) an expert committee that consisted of three geriatricians and two neurologists, one Turkish lecturer reviewed to compare backward translations with the English test; and (v) pretest. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were performed. To diagnose each type of dementia, gold standard diagnostic criteria specifically defined for each dementia were used. Performances of RCS test for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were analyzed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsAmong participants, 37.2% were considered as cognitively normal, 25.6% with MCI and 37.2% with dementia. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RCS (cut-off point of 4) for dementia were 89.06%, 92.56%, 87.7%, and 93.5%, respectively whereas the values were 77.27%, 51.56%, 52.3%, and 76.7% for MCI with a cut-off point of 8. The RCS predicted dementia (AUC = 0.972, 95% CI: 0.935-0.991) and MCI (AUC = 0.720%, 95% CI: 0.626-0.802).ConclusionThe cross-cultural adaptation was successfully achieved. The Turkish-RCS was found to be a reliable and valid test for screening of cognitive dysfunction.