Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine, cilt.15, sa.12, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 15 Sayı: 12
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/jcm15124593
- Dergi Adı: Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Chemical Abstracts Core, EMBASE, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: erector spinae plane block, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, paravertebral block, postoperative pain, quality of recovery
- İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objectives: This randomized, single-blind study aimed to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and intravenous (IV) analgesia on postoperative pain, opioid consumption and quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: A total of 120 adult patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective LC were randomized into three groups: ESPB (GI), TPVB (GII) and IV analgesia (GIII). Bilateral ESPB or TPVB was performed preoperatively; then all patients received standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia including paracetamol, tenoxicam and IV tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was 24 h tramadol consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, rescue analgesia requirement, patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Results: Twenty-four-hour tramadol consumption was significantly higher in GIII (135.78 ± 22.73 mg) compared with GI (101.05 ± 26.99 mg) and GII (95.67 ± 31.49 mg) (p < 0.001), with no difference between GI and GII. Both static and dynamic pain scores were lower in GI and GII compared with GIII at most time points. Rescue analgesia requirement and patient dissatisfaction were significantly higher in GIII. QoR-15 scores were significantly improved in GI and GII compared with GIII (p < 0.001), while no difference was observed between the regional techniques. Block performance time was shorter with ESPB than TPVB (p < 0.001). No complications were reported. Conclusions: ESPB and TPVB provided effective analgesia and improved recovery after LC compared with IV analgesia alone. Both regional techniques may be considered as components of multimodal analgesia after LC.