Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a patient receiving anticonvulsant therapy during cranial irradiation.


Eralp Y., Aydiner A., Tas F., Saip P., Topuz E.

American journal of clinical oncology, cilt.24, sa.4, ss.347-50, 2001 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2001
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/00000421-200108000-00005
  • Dergi Adı: American journal of clinical oncology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.347-50
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, anticonvulsant therapy, radiation treatment, mucocutaneous reactions, brain metastasis, breast cancer, EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS, CUTANEOUS REACTIONS, PHENYTOIN, DIPHENYLHYDANTOIN, HYPERSENSITIVITY
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

A 28-year-old female patient with a recent history of breast carcinoma was referred to our clinic with generalized necrotic skin eruptions and severe mucosal erosions, which developed right after the completion of cranial radiotherapy for brain metastases. She had been receiving prophylactic diphenylhydantoin treatment 100 mg three times daily during radiation therapy. The extensive involvement of the oral mucosa with conjunctivitis and synechiae of the eyelids, facial swelling, and extension of the rash over the trunk and shoulders with bullous detachment of less than 10% of the total body surface strongly suggested Stevens-Johnson syndrome caused by phenytoin treatment in our patient. There has been conflicting evidence on the role of radiotherapy in the increased risk of severe drug reactions. Although various authors have emphasized the augmented rate of severe mucocutaneous reactions caused by anticonvulsants given during radiotherapy and suggested discontinuing the prophylactic use of such drugs in patients with no history of seizures, others have argued in favor of prophylactic anticonvulsants. Given the high risk of seizures, reaching 20% in patients with brain tumors, and the low incidence of drug reactions, the suggestion of refraining from prophylactic anticonvulsants in the setting of primary or metastatic brain tumors is controversial.