Comparison of Treatment Options for Enthesitis-Related Arthritis with the Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index


Creative Commons License

DEMİRKAN F. G., Akgun O., Guliyeva V., Ayaz N. A.

Haseki Tip Bulteni, cilt.61, sa.4, ss.273-279, 2023 (ESCI) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 61 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2023.9414
  • Dergi Adı: Haseki Tip Bulteni
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.273-279
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Biologic drug, enthesopathy, spondyloarthritis
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Aim: The Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (JSpADA) is the only disease activity score specifically validated for children with enthesitis-associated arthritis (ERA). It was developed to address the need for an effective measurement tool to assess disease activity in this population. We aimed to evaluate the clinical course of patients with ERA using JSpADA and to compare the effects of treatment modalities using JSpADA. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 61 patients with ERA who were followed up between January 2020 and 2023. Clinical features, treatment options, and JSpADA were noted in electronic medical files. The effectiveness of treatment modalities was compared by JSpADA. Results: The median age of onset of the group was 10 [interquartile range (IQR), 9-15] years. The study cohort included three groups of patients: 1) DMARD received (n=34); 2) biologic drug received (n=14); 3) DMARD and biological combination received (n=13). Forty-three cases (70%) presented with peripheral arthritis, including enthesitis, whereas 18 (30%) patients had axial involvement. At disease onset, the median JSpADA scores were 2 (IQR, 2-3), 2.5 (IQR, 2-3), and 3.5 (IQR, 2.5-5) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.27). At the first year of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the disease activity of groups 1 and 2 (p=0.02 and p=0.04). However, there was no significant reduction in JSpADA values in the third group. Conclusion: In patients with ERA, intermittent JSpADA evaluation during visits can guide the objective and accurate follow-up and treatment response of patients.