Evaluating the coastal ecosystem status of two Western and Eastern Mediterranean islands using the seagrass Posidonia oceanica

Guresen A., Pergent G., Guresen S. O., Aktan Y.

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, cilt.108, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 108
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105734
  • Dergi Adı: ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Environment Index, Geobase, Index Islamicus, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, Public Affairs Index, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica is used as a 'biological quality element' in the long-term monitoring programmes of the Water Framework Directive (WFD 2000/60/EC) for the evaluation of ecological status of coastal waters. Due to its low resilience to anthropogenic pressures, P. oceanica meadows have disappeared irreversibly along some of the Mediterranean coasts. The main objective of this survey, is therefore to compare the ecological status of coastal waters and P. oceanica meadows in two islands from Eastern (Gokceada, Turkey) and Western (Corsica, France) Mediterranean Sea based on the Posidonia Biotic Index (BiPo) and the Vitality Index besides concentrating on: (i) their consistency in different environmental conditions present in the Mediterranean Sea, (ii) their effectiveness to discriminate the ecological status of coastal waters in relation to different anthropogenic pressures and (iii) their application capacity to initiate long-term data series for monitoring the evolution of the meadows in less evaluated regions (i.e. from the Eastern Mediterranean). The measurements of several descriptors of P. oceanica are interpreted based on the BiPo and the Vitality indices for 2 regions; 9 sites from Gokceada and 15 sites from Corsica exposed to different human pressures. The mean BiPo and Vitality indices are higher in Corsica than in Gokceada, where the values correspond to a "good" status for Corsica and a "moderate" status in Gokceada. The application of these biotic indices showed their feasibility and comparability to assess the ecological status in different environmental conditions. Significant relationships between the scores of Anthropization index and the EQR values of the BiPo index (r = - 0.745, p < 0.01) and the Vitality index (r = - 0.702, p < 0.01) highlighted their efficiency to determine the seagrass degradation in the sites subjected to higher pressure levels. It can be assumed that this study initiates the development of long-term data series and also meets the essential data deficiency in less evaluated regions.