Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF)
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, cilt.4, sa.1, ss.27-35, 2018 (ESCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 4 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2018
- Doi Numarası: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx030
- Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.27-35
- İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır
Özet
Aims Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result.