Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF)


Fox K. A. A. , Accetta G., Pieper K. S. , Bassand J., Camm A. J. , Fitzmaurice D. A. , ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, cilt.4, ss.27-35, 2018 (ESCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 4 Konu: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx030
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.27-35

Özet

Aims Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result.