Medicine, vol.104, no.37, 2025 (SCI-Expanded)
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently affects women of reproductive age. While the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents during pregnancy is well established, data on the safety of ustekinumab remain limited. We aimed to compare the safety of ustekinumab versus anti-TNF therapy in pregnant patients with IBD in terms of pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents and reporting key pregnancy outcomes were included. Pooled analyses were performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Four studies, encompassing 3308 pregnancies (592 ustekinumab, 2716 anti-TNF) were included. The majority of patients (2914; 88.2%) had Crohn disease, and the median disease duration ranged from 6.5 to 14 years. There was no significant difference between ustekinumab and anti-TNF therapy in major pregnancy outcomes, including live birth rates (67.2% vs 67.7%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-1.37), spontaneous abortion rates (5.9% vs 4.2%; OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.74-3.36), preterm delivery rates (6.6% vs 7.4%; OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.15-1.61), low birth weight rates (4.6% vs 7.1%; OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.23-1.98), and cesarean section rates (30.0% vs 30.1%; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.85-1.45). CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab appears comparable to anti-TNF agents regarding major pregnancy outcomes in pregnant patients with IBD, suggesting its potential safety during pregnancy.