When Energy Efficiency Backfires: Behavioral Rebound Effects Offset Carbon Savings in Mercantile Buildings


Ozyigit O., Coskun G., Akyuz I., Camlibel M. E., Cengiz E.

SUSTAINABILITY, vol.18, no.13, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 18 Issue: 13
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.3390/su18136784
  • Journal Name: SUSTAINABILITY
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Geobase, INSPEC
  • Istanbul University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Raising indoor temperature setpoints is widely promoted as a practical way to reduce cooling-related energy demand in commercial buildings, yet its net carbon impact becomes uncertain once behavioral rebound effects are considered. This study develops an integrated carbon-accounting framework to evaluate the climate implications of summer indoor temperature increases of 1-3 degrees C in U.S. mercantile buildings. The framework combines operational energy savings from reduced cooling demand with consumption-driven emissions arising from longer customer dwell times and increased consumer spending under improved thermal comfort conditions. Carbon outcomes are quantified using sector-level electricity data and the USEEIO emission factor for retail trade. The results reveal a clear imbalance: operational carbon savings range from 0.21 to 0.64 Mt CO2, whereas consumption-driven emissions range from 3.37 to 21.90 Mt CO2, yielding a consistently positive net carbon impact of 3.16-21.26 Mt CO2 across all scenarios. A break-even analysis indicates that only 1.30-3.89 billion USD in additional spending is sufficient to offset the operational savings. The findings remained robust across alternative behavioral and carbon-accounting specifications; a 10,000-iteration Monte Carlo analysis produced positive net carbon impacts in every simulation (median 8.54 Mt CO2; P(NCI > 0) = 1.00). Overall, the results suggest that temperature-based efficiency measures may overstate their climate benefits when behavioral responses are ignored, highlighting the importance of incorporating rebound effects into building energy assessments and commercial climate policy.