Journal of Humanity, Peace and Justice, vol.1, no.2, pp.96-105, 2025 (Peer-Reviewed Journal)
This paper examines the dynamics of realpolitik and the manifestation of double standards within the
United Nations (UN) by focusing on two ongoing geopolitical crises: the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022-)
and the Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza (2023-). Through a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative
and quantitative data, the study analyzes voting patterns in the UN General Assembly to uncover how
national interests and power dynamics influence international responses and the setting of the global
agenda. The thematic analysis reveals that Western countries exhibit strong support for Ukraine due
to strategic alliances and geopolitical considerations, whereas humanitarian concerns dominate the
discourse on Gaza, albeit with significant variance when sovereignty and human rights issues are concurrently addressed. The findings underscore the complexity of reconciling national interests with universal
principles of human rights and international law, highlighting the challenges faced by global governance
structures in maintaining equity and consistency. This study contributes to the broader discourse on
international relations and global governance by elucidating the interplay between power, interests, and
normative frameworks in shaping international policy and responses.