A SINGLE-CENTER REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE WITH FIRST-LINE DARATUMUMAB, BORTEZOMIB, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE (DARA-VCD) IN AL AMYLOIDOSIS


Mastanzade M., Ören Çelik M. M., Erdem S., Murat Özbalak M., Hindilerden İ. Y., Yenerel M. N., ...Daha Fazla

Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy, cilt.46, ss.26-27, 2024 (Scopus)

Özet

Systemic amyloidosis results from the production of misfolded immunoglobulin light chains by monoclonal CD38+ plasma cells. These misfolded light chains form amyloid fibrils, which accumulate in various tissues and cause organ damage. Following the results of the Phase 3 ANDROMEDA study, where the addition of daratumumab, an anti-CD38 agent, to first-line treatment showed favorable outcomes, Dara-VCD has become a standard first-line therapy. In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis who were treated with first-line Dara-VCD in our clinic to those treated with other triplet regimens.

Methodology

Patient's data with AL amyloidosis followed between 2010 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed from the institution's database. Two groups were established patients treated with Dara-VCD and those without Dara. The clinical characteristics and response criteria were compared using SPSS 21.

Results

A total of 52 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 60 ± 10 years for the entire group. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic distribution between the groups (p = 0.003). The median follow-up period was 32 months (1-114 months). In 27 (51.9%) patients, cardiac involvement was present, and 26 (50%) had renal involvement. The stages of these involvements are summarized in Table 1. In the group treated without Dara, the triplet regimens were VCD (n=30), VRD (n=3), and VMP (n=2).
Mortality was significantly lower in the Dara-VCD group. When evaluating responses, progression was only in 1 (9%) patient in the Dara group, whereas in 8 (32%) in the without Dara group.
The overall survival was not statistically significant between the two groups (log-rank p=0.394). (Figure 1).

Conclusion

We used Dara after Health Authority approval and reimbursement in our country. So, we get the opportunity to compare Dara-added VCD effectiveness to VCD or VRD as a real-life analysis. Dara-VCD resulted in a significantly lower rate of progression and mortality compared to those without Dara. The follow-up duration was shorter for comment on overall survival. Additionally, 10 patients without the Dara group, did receive daratumumab with VCD (n=5), or with other agents (n=5)). With this study, we documented from a real-life experience addition of daratumumab to the VCD regimen in first-line treatment reduces mortality and progression in AL amyloidosis.

Table 1. Patient Characteristics

Empty CellDara-VCD (n=17)Other Triplet Regimens (n=35)P-value
Age (mean ± std)65±657±110,003
Gender (F/M)10 (%58.8)/7 (%41.2)14 (%40)/21 (%60)0,202
Median follow-up (months)15(1-68)36 (1-114)0,108
ECOG performance score >27 (%43.8)11 (%33.3)0,273
Mayo 2012 Staging System0,954
Stage 16 (%37.5)10 (%29.4)
Stage 23 (%18.8)7 (%20.6)
Stage 35 (%31,3)12 (%35,3)
Stage 42 (%12.5)5 (%14.7)
Palladini et al. Staging System0,166
Stage 17 (%43.8)18 (%51,4)
Stage 27 (%43.8)7 (%20)
Stage 32 (%12.5)10 (%28,6)
dFLC (mg/L)106,5 (4-1945)95 (0-2425)0,624
hs Pro BNP (median)1769 (25-30117)1184 (17-25113)0,4
eGFR (mL/min)71 (2-106)85 (9-124)0,264
ASCT3 (%17,6)12 (%34,3)0,214
Mortality3 (%17,6)18 (%51,4)0,02
Treatment Response (Hematologic)0,042
VGPR and above8 (%72,7)7 (%28)
SD2 (%18,2)10 (%40)
Progression1 (9,1)8 (%32)
Unlabelled image
  1. Download: Download high-res image (100KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image
Figure 1: Overall Survival in Dara-VCD and without-Dara Triplet Treatment Groups