Interscalene brachial plexus block with bupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients with chronic renal failure: Diaphragmatic excursion and pulmonary function changes


Altintas F., GUMUS F., Kaya G., Mihmanli I., Kantarci F., Kaynak K., ...Daha Fazla

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, cilt.100, sa.4, ss.1166-1171, 2005 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 100 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2005
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1213/01.ane.0000154443.68396.70
  • Dergi Adı: ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1166-1171
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared the anesthetic characteristics and pulmonary function changes of 0.33% bupivacaine and 0.33% ropivacaine used for interscalene brachial plexus (IBP) anesthesia in patients with chronic renal failure. Forty-two patients undergoing IBP anesthesia for creation of arteriovenous fistulas were randomly allocated to receive either 30 mL of 0.33% bupivacaine (Group B) or 0.33% ropivacaine (Group R). Block onset time, diaphragmatic excursion (ultrasonographic evaluation), and free plasma concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were evaluated. Negative motion or immobility of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm and a decrease of > 10 mm in positive motion were defined as diaphragmatic paresis. The pulmonary function variables were measured by bedside spirometry equipment. Seven patients needed supplemental local anesthetic, one with total spinal block; these patients were excluded from the study. The success rate was 80.9%. Block quality was similar in the two groups. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic excursion was decreased in both groups compared with baseline values (P < 0.05). Diaphragmatic paresis was identified in 10 of 16 patients and 8 of 18 patients in Groups B and R, respectively (P > 0.05). Pulmonary function significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (forced vital capacity (FVC) 30%, forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) 32%, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) 31% in Group B and FVC 17%, FEV1 17%, and PEF 5% in Group R) (P < 0.001). The decreases in Group B were larger than those in Group R (P < 0.05). Three patients in Group B and one in Group R had mild respiratory problems (P > 0.05). Concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were below toxic levels rather than "normal range." We conclude that pulmonary function decreased more after IBP with 0.33% bupivacaine than with 0.33% ropivacaine.