Assessment of living donors with respect to pre- and posttransplant psychosocial properties and posttransplant family functioning in pediatric liver transplantation


Gokce S., Durmaz O., Gursu G. P., Aydogan A., Celtik C., Ozden I., ...Daha Fazla

TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, cilt.22, sa.1, ss.36-41, 2011 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 22 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2011
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4318/tjg.2011.0154
  • Dergi Adı: TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.36-41
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background/aims: We aimed in this study to investigate pre- and posttransplant clinical and psychosocial features of the donors and the effects of living-related liver transplantation and possible relevant factors on psychosocial outcome and family functioning. Methods: Thirty-two living donors (19 females, age 31.84 +/- 7.10 years) were evaluated. Medical records of donors regarding pre- and posttransplant clinical and psychological features and family life were evaluated. Results: The donors were parents (n=28, 87.6%) in most. In the pretransplant evaluation, 5 donors (19.3%) had anxiety regarding postoperative complications and quality of life. Donors were discharged from the hospital in a median of 7 days (range, 5-30 days). Return to work and feeling of complete well-being were accomplished in a median of 4 weeks (range, 1-32 weeks) and 10 weeks (range, 4-48 weeks), respectively. Sixteen recipients (50.0%) suffered from major complications, and 3 (9.4%) required invasive intervention. Fourteen donors (43.4%) reported pain around the surgical incision and nonspecific gastrointestinal problems postoperatively. Psychological problems were observed in 8 donors (25.0%); 2 (6.3%) had depression requiring drug and psychotherapeutic intervention. Psychological disruption was found to be correlated with the presence of problems in the recipient (p < 0.01, r=0.487). The donors' relationship with the recipient was negatively affected in 1 (3.1%), but improved in 15 (46.9%) cases. Nine donors (34.6%) displayed nervous behavior toward their spouses, and 2 (7.7%) later divorced. Life of the other family members was negatively affected in 8 (30.7%). Two donors' spouses (7.7%) failed to carry out domestic responsibilities. Conclusions: Psychological disturbance and abnormal family functioning are frequently observed during the posttransplant period. Therefore, psychologic assessment and evaluation of family functioning should be regularly repeated during the posttransplant period.