Limb salvage results of Gustilo IIIC fractures of the lower extremity


Creative Commons License

ÖZMEN E., BALCI H. İ., SALDUZ A., Eralp I. L.

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, no.3, pp.569-573, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.52628/88.3.6600
  • Journal Name: ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Page Numbers: pp.569-573
  • Istanbul University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This study aims to present our results for limb salvage in Gustilo IIIC open fractures of the femur and tibia. 92 patients with Gustilo IIIC fractures operated in our clinic between January 2000 and March 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic data, ischemia time, method of arterial repair, means of primary and secondary fixation, time to amputation, complications, and final VAS scores were recorded. The difference between the primary amputation rates of tibia and femur fractures was not statistically significant (18% vs 21%, p>0.05). The difference between the secondary amputation rates of tibia and femur fractures was not significant (16% vs 27%, p>0.05). All secondary amputations were done within the first month during the initial hospital stay. Overall limb salvage rate was 69% for Gustilo IIIC fractures of the femur and 58% for Gustilo IIIC fractures of the tibia. The overall limb salvage rate was not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). At the final follow-up, patients in the limb salvage group had average VAS scores of 4.3 (femur) and 4.7 (tibia). The decision between amputation versus limb salvage remains a difficult decision that should be jointly made by the treating physicians and the patient.