Cultural and linguistic adaptation, preliminary psychometric characterization, and reference data for the Turkish verbal FCSRT-16
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1080/13854046.2026.2719746
- Dergi Adı: CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Educational research abstracts (ERA), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Psycinfo, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO)
- İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective: The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test uses controlled learning to assess hippocampal-type memory impairment. This study culturally and linguistically adapted three Turkish verbal forms of the 16-item test (FCSRT-16TR) and characterized their psychometric properties, score-level comparability, and demographic reference estimates. Method: The complete-case reference sample comprised 285 cognitively unimpaired native Turkish-speaking adults aged 18-87 years. A pilot study (N = 45) refined the stimulus sets. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted in a broader dataset with complete item-level responses (N = 387). Score-level comparability was examined using omnibus and two one-sided equivalence tests. Demographic models included age, education, and sex. Results: Score-level performance was broadly comparable across forms, although one total-free-recall contrast was borderline under the prespecified equivalence criterion. Continuous demographic models were developed for total free recall (TFR) and delayed free recall (DFR). Age showed significant nonlinear associations with both outcomes, whereas higher education and female sex predicted better performance. The models explained 35.2% and 25.2% of TFR and DFR variance, respectively. Under 10-fold cross-validation, predictive R2 values were .320 and .233, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 4.39 and 1.68, respectively. Conclusions: The FCSRT-16TR provides three adapted Turkish verbal forms with broadly comparable score-level performance and demographically adjusted reference estimates for the principal free-recall outcomes. These estimates provide a language-specific reference framework for cognitively unimpaired Turkish-speaking adults but should not be interpreted as diagnostic cutoffs or evidence of within-person form interchangeability.