A Damascene Shāfi'ī Professor-Mufti in Istanbul: Najm al-Dīn al-Ghazzī's Travelogue (1032/1623) Dımaşklı Bir Şâfiî Müderris-Müftünün İstanbul Serüveni: Necmeddin el-Gazzî'nin Seyahatnamesi (1032/1623)


Kami G.

Islam Tetkikleri Dergisi, cilt.13, sa.1, ss.175-201, 2023 (Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.26650/iuitd.2023.1219821
  • Dergi Adı: Islam Tetkikleri Dergisi
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.175-201
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: al-Ghazzī, Damascus, Istanbul, Ottoman History, Travelogue
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this article is to introduce Najm al-Dīn al-Ghazzī's (d. 1061/1651) Istanbul travelogue, which until recently was considered to be lost, as a new primary source for the examination of early modern Ottoman history. As an eminent Shāfi'ī professor-mufti in Damascus, Najm al-Dīn traveled to Istanbul in 1623 with the intention of petitioning the Imperial Council to regain his teaching position that he had lost to a rival local scholar. His journey took him four and a half months, during which time he penned an account in the form of a travelogue, adhering to the literary conventions established by previous Arab travelers. This article examines the content of the autograph copy of the travelogue highlighting Najm al-Dīn's views on cities, architectural structures, individuals, and significant socio-political events in Damascus, Istanbul, and other Anatolian towns on his way. It also scrutinizes Najm al-Dīn's narrative strategies throughout the travelogue, including his use of language and poetic composition as well as inclusion of dream and fortune-telling anecdotes. This article also considers the relationship between Najm al-Dīn's work and previous Arabic travelogues to highlight continuities and divergences, as well as new information provided. Najm al-Dīn's travelogue offers a vivid description of Anatolian towns in the early seventeenth century. It also provides insight into the multi-faceted imperial factionalism in Istanbul in the post-Osman II (d. 1031/1622) period. Furthermore, the narrative elements within the travelogue shed light on the mindset and vision of an early modern provincial Shāfi'ī professor-mufti in the Ottoman center.