Durvalumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Outcomes in Age, Sex, and Platinum Subgroups From the Phase 3 CASPIAN Study


Reinmuth N., Goldman J. W., Chen Y., Hotta K., Trukhin D., Statsenko G., ...More

CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, vol.26, no.8, pp.626-641, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 26 Issue: 8
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.001
  • Journal Name: CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Page Numbers: pp.626-641
  • Istanbul University Affiliated: No

Abstract

In exploratory analyses of CASPIAN, outcomes were assessed in age (< 70 versus >= 70 years), sex, and planned platinum agent (cisplatin versus carboplatin) subgroups. OS favored durvalumab plus EP versus EP across sex and planned platinum subgroups. The age 70 years subgroup was smali, preventing robust conclusions. These results support the use of durvalumab plus EP as first-line standard-of-care for ES-SCLC. Introduction: In the phase 3 CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab plus etoposide combined with either carboplatin or cisplatin (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone in treatment-naive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report exploratory subgroup analyses from CASPIAN. Methods: Patients with untreated ES-SCLC were randomized to durvalumab plus EP or EP alone. We analyzed OS and safety in subgroups defined by age, sex, and planned platinum agent, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by age. Results: Of 537 patients (durvalumab plus EP: n = 268; EP alone: n = 269), 80.6% versus 19.4% were aged <70 versus >= 70 years; 69.6% versus 30.4% were male versus female; and planned platinum was cisplatin versus carboplatin in 25.1% versus 74.9%. The OS HRs for durvalumab plus EP versus EP were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.88) versus 0.74 (95% CI, 0.49-1.11) for patients aged <70 versus >= 70 years; 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95) versus 0.60 (95% CI, 0.42-0.84) for males versus females; and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94) versus 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.91) for planned cisplatin versus carboplatin. With durvalumab plus EP, rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were similar across subgroups; serious AEs were more frequent in patients aged >= 70 versus <70 years; and immune-mediated AEs were more common in females versus males. Adding durvalumab to EP had no detrimental effect on PROs in either age subgroup. Conclusions: These findings support the use of durvalumab plus EP as first-line standard of care for ES-SCLC. Additional trials focused on elderly populations would be informative.