A comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of osteosynthesis complications in sheep mandibular angle fractures.

Sirin, Selahattin; Yildirimturk, Senem; AYTUĞAR, EMRE; Cakarer, Sırmahan; Horasan, Sinan; Guven, Koray

doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.001

A comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of osteosynthesis complications in sheep mandibular angle fractures.

Atıf İçin Kopyala

Sirin Y., Yildirimturk S., AYTUĞAR E., Cakarer S., Horasan S., Guven K.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, cilt.127, sa.2, ss.167-174, 2019 (SCI-Expanded)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 127 Sayı: 2
Basım Tarihi: 2019
Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.001
Dergi Adı: Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.167-174
İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiography (PANO) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting simulated complications of plate osteosynthesis applied to mandibular angle fractures (MAFs).